Evaluasi perilaku seismik struktur bangunan gedung asrama di Yogyakarta dengan nonlinear static procedure


Date Published : 30 July 2026
paper-cover

Contributors

Yunalia Muntafi

Universitas Islam Indonesia
Author

Muhammad George Husien Zen

Universitas Islam Indonesia
Correspondence Author

DOI

ISBN

2962-2697

Keywords

Pushover analysis ATC-40 Seismic behavior Performance level Plastic hinge

Proceeding

Track

General Track

License

Copyright (c) 2026 CE ReForm

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Indonesia is in a highly seismic region due to the interaction of active tectonic plates, particularly along the Java subduction zone with its relatively steep dip angle. In addition, the collapse of a dormitory building at another Islamic boarding school in 2025 ago and the location of the studied building within the affected area of the 2006 Yogyakarta Earthquake associated with the Opak Fault highlight the importance of seismic performance evaluation. This study evaluated the seismic behavior of the C Dormitory Building of Madrasah Mu’allimin Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta using linear and nonlinear analyses based on SNI 1726:2019, SNI 1727:2020, SNI 2847:2019, and ATC-40. Linear analysis was performed through equivalent static and response spectrum analyses to evaluate structural irregularities, inter-story drift, and P-delta effects, while nonlinear evaluation was conducted using the Nonlinear Static Procedure (NSP). The results indicate that the structure does not exhibit horizontal or vertical irregularities, and both inter-story drift and P-delta effects satisfy the specified requirements. The pushover analysis produced a maximum base shear of 17,679.6086 kN with a displacement of 201.441 mm in the x-direction, and 21,394.983 kN with a displacement of 308.355 mm in the y-direction. Based on the ATC-40 performance evaluation, the structure is classified under the Damage Control (DC) performance level in both directions. In addition, the plastic hinge distribution indicates a beam sway mechanism consistent with the strong column–weak beam concept, where yielding predominantly occurs in beam elements before columns.

References

Anwar, N., 2004. Pushover Analysis Using ETABS and SAP2000, in: Association of Structural Engineers Philippines Seminar. ACECOMS.
ATC-40, 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, California Seismic Safety Commission.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2020. Beban Desain Minimum Dan Kriteria Terkait Untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Struktur Lain (1727:2020). Jakarta.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2019a. Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa Untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan Non Gedung (1726:2019). Jakarta.
Badan Standardisasi Nasional, 2019b. Persyaratan Beton Struktural Untuk Bangunan Gedung dan Penjelasan (2847:2019). Jakarta.
Bird, P., 2003. An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochemistry, Geophys. Geosystems 4.
Darwin, D., Dolan, C.W., Nilson, A.H., 2016. Design of Concrete Structures, 15 ed. Mc Graw Hill Education.
Fairuz, F.M., Thamrin, R., Zaidir, 2021. Kinerja Struktur Gedung Beton Bertulang dengan Variasi Arah Penampang dan Rasio Tulangan Kolom. SIKLUS J. Tek. Sipil 7, 13.
Mahendra, A.I., 2022. Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Gedung 9 Lantai Beton Bertulang dengan Pushover Analysis Berdasarkan ATC-40 (Studi Kasus : Gedung Fakultas Psikologi Uin Sunan Ampel Surabaya).
Muntafi, Y., 2012. Evaluasi Kinerja Bangunan Gedung Dpu Wilayah Kabupaten Dengan Analisis Pushover. Simp. Nas. RAPI XI FT UMS 2012.
Muntafi, Y., Nojima, N., 2021. Seismic Properties and Fractal Dimension of Subduction Zone in Java and Its Vicinity Using Data From 1906 To 2020. Int. J. GEOMATE 21, 71–83.
Nagargoje, S., Deshmukh, G., 2021. Influence of Aspect Ratio & Plan Configurations on Seismic Performance of Multi-storeyed R . C . C . Buildings using Response Spectrum Analysis 8, 817–821.
Pawirodikromo, W., 2012. Seismologi Teknik dan Rekayasa Kegempaan, Pustaka Pelajar.
Suwandi, H.P., 2019. Analisis Gempa Non-Linear Static Pushover Dengan Metode Atc-40 Untuk Evaluasi Kinerja Struktur Bangunan Gedung. Modul. Media Komun. Dunia Ilmu Sipil 1. https://doi.org/10.32585/modulus.v1i1.379
Tim Pusat Studi Gempa Nasional, 2017. Peta Sumber Dan Bahaya Gempa Indonesia Tahun 2017. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perumahan dan Permukiman Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.
Utomo, C., Susanto, R.I., Tujono, S., Wibowo, H., 2012. Evaluasi Struktur Dengan Pushover Analysis Pada Gedung Kalibata Residences Jakarta (The Evaluation Of The Structure by Using Pushover Analysis of Kalibata Residences Building Jakarta). Jur. Tek. Sipil, Fak. Tek. Univ. Diponegoro.
Walter, T.R., Wang, R., Luehr, B.G., Wassermann, J., Behr, Y., Parolai, S., Anggraini, A., Günther, E., Sobiesiak, M., Grosser, H., Wetzel, H.U., Milkereit, C., Sri Brotopuspito, P.J.K., Harjadi, P., Zschau, J., 2008. The 26 May 2006 magnitude 6.4 Yogyakarta earthquake south of Mt. Merapi volcano: Did lahar deposits amplify ground shaking and thus lead to the disaster? Geochemistry, Geophys. Geosystems 9, 1–9.

Downloads

How to Cite

Muntafi, Y. (2026). Evaluasi perilaku seismik struktur bangunan gedung asrama di Yogyakarta dengan nonlinear static procedure . CE ReForm, 6(1), 70-81. https://doi.org//j4gktj26