Random forest prediction of ACeBS seismic resilience scores for simple residential buildings in Yogyakarta


Date Published : 30 July 2026
paper-cover

Contributors

Fazli

Universitas Islami Indonesia
Correspondence Author

Sarwidi

Universitas Islam Indonesia
Dosen Pembimbing 1

Sri Kusumadewi

Dosen Pembmbing 2

DOI

ISBN

2962-2697

Keywords

ACeBS Seismic vulnerability Random forest Feature importance Residential buildings

Proceeding

Track

General Track

License

Copyright (c) 2026 CE ReForm

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The Asesmen Cepat Bangunan Sederhana (ACeBS) is a 47-item checklist used in Indonesia to rate the earthquake resilience of simple residential buildings, but its scoring still relies on manual field tabulation by trained surveyors, which is slow and difficult to scale. This study develops and validates a machine-learning model that predicts the ACeBS resilience score directly from the recorded checklist answers and building age, and identifies which assessment items most influence the score. A dataset of 110 single-storey houses surveyed across the five regencies of the Special Region of Yogyakarta was used; each record contains binary responses to the 47 ACeBS items, the building age, and the percentage resilience score. A Random Forest regressor with 100 trees was trained on 100 buildings using ten-fold cross-validation and tested on 10 unseen buildings, with R-squared, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) as performance metrics and Gini importance for parameter screening. The model reproduced the resilience score with high accuracy, reaching a cross-validation R-squared of 0.853 (MAPE 14.6%, RMSE 8.56) and an evaluation R-squared of 0.922 (MAPE 5.31%, RMSE 4.21). Feature-importance analysis showed that three checklist items (P21, P20, P12) together with building age accounted for the majority of the predictive power, and that 32 of the 48 inputs exceeded the 0.005 retention threshold. The findings indicate that ACeBS scoring can be reliably automated and reduced to a smaller set of decisive items, supporting faster and more consistent pre-disaster screening.

References

Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
Burlotos, C., Kijewski-Correa, T. L., & Taflanidis, A. A. (2020). The housing market value chain: An integrated approach for mitigating risk in informal residential construction in Haiti. Sustainability, 12(19), 8006. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198006
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785–794). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785
Hamit, I., Saputra, A., & Siswanto, M. F. (2023). The effectiveness of the rehabilitation and reconstruction program for post-earthquake community houses in North Lombok Regency in 2018. Jurnal PenSil, 12(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v12i3.35114
Librian, V., Ramdhan, M., Nugraha, A. D., Mukti, M. M., Syuhada, S., Lühr, B.-G., Widiyantoro, S., Mursitantyo, A., Anggraini, A., Zulfakriza, Z., Muttaqy, F., & Husni, Y. M. (2024). Detailed seismic structure beneath the earthquake zone of Yogyakarta 2006 (Mw ~6.4), Indonesia, from local earthquake tomography. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 351, 107170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2024.107170
Lorito, S., Romano, F., & Lay, T. (2015). Tsunamigenic major and great earthquakes (2004–2013): Source processes inverted from seismic, geodetic, and sea-level data. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 1–52). Springer.
Ministry of Public Works and Housing (PUPR). (2016). Regulation No. 5/2016: Guidelines for earthquake-resistant housing construction. Jakarta, Indonesia: PUPR.
Mishra, A., Agnihotri, A. K., Pipil, S., Gaur, S., & Ohri, A. (2024). Surveying techniques for urban areas. In Earth observation in urban monitoring (pp. 69–91). Elsevier.
Murjaya, J., Pramumijoyo, S., Karnawati, D., Daryono, Meilano, I., Supendi, P., Ahadi, S., Marliyani, G. I., Imananta, Syukur, F., Sianipar, D. S., & Krisno, A. (2021). Earthquake risk assessment of the Opak and Merapi–Merbabu active faults to support mitigation program in Yogyakarta Province and its vicinity. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 851(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/851/1/012001
Papatheodorou, K., Theodoulidis, N., Klimis, N., Zulfikar, C., Vintila, D., Cardanet, V., Kirtas, E., Toma-Danila, D., Margaris, B., Fahjan, Y., Panagopoulos, G., Karakostas, C., Papathanassiou, G., & Valkaniotis, S. (2023). Rapid earthquake damage assessment and education to improve earthquake response efficiency and community resilience. Sustainability, 15(24), 16603. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152416603
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.
Ramdhan, M., Palgunadi, K. H., Mukti, M. M., Librian, V., Daniarsyad, G., Muttaqy, F., Hidayat, E., Syuhada, S., Hanif, M., Mursitantyo, A., Lühr, B.-G., Nugraha, A. D., Widiyantoro, S., Setyonegoro, W., & Febriani, F. (2025). Aftershock sequence of the Yogyakarta earthquake 2006 (Mw ~6.4), Indonesia, based on analysis of hypocenter relocation, static, and dynamic stress. Natural Hazards, 121(14), 16559–16579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07440-8
Saputra, A., Gomez, C., Delikostidis, I., Zawar-Reza, P., Hadmoko, D. S., & Sartohadi, J. (2021). Preliminary identification of earthquake-triggered multi-hazard and risk in Pleret sub-district (Yogyakarta, Indonesia). Geo-spatial Information Science, 24(2), 256–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2020.1801335
Suroso, D. S. A., & Firman, T. (2019). Urban resilience and disaster management in Indonesia. Cities, 95, 102446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.06.012
Susri Nurhaci, D., Setianto, A., & Wilopo, W. (2024). Analysis and evaluation of earthquake hazard zones based on spatial models for regency regional development Bantul. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1373(1), 012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1373/1/012014
Weber, R., Cummins, P., & Edwards, M. (2024). Fragility of Indonesian houses: Scenario damage analysis of the 2006 Yogyakarta and 2009 Padang earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 22(9), 4705–4743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01930-z

Downloads

How to Cite

Random forest prediction of ACeBS seismic resilience scores for simple residential buildings in Yogyakarta. (2026). CE ReForm, 6(1), 82-90. https://doi.org//7t18e675