Conference Universitas Islam Indonesia (UII)
CE ReForm

Analisis bibliometrik perkembangan dan pemetaan lanskap tematik penelitian respons seismik struktur bangunan

Date Published : 30 July 2026
paper-cover

Contributors

Reytaza Aulia Putri

Universitas Islam Indonesia
Correspondence Author

Astriana Hardawati

Universitas Islam Indonesia
Author

DOI

DOI /03jmn125

ISBN

2962-2967

Keywords

Bibliometric analysis Seismic response Building structure VOSviewer Scopus

Proceeding

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): The 11th CE ReForm

Track

General Track

License

Copyright (c) 2026 CE ReForm

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Seismic response analysis of building structures has emerged as one of the most actively investigated domains in earthquake engineering, driven by escalating seismic vulnerability of the built environment globally. Despite the growing volume of scholarly output, a comprehensive mapping of the intellectual landscape governing this field, encompassing dominant themes, leading contributors, and evolving trajectories, remains insufficiently documented. This study presents a systematic bibliometric analysis of 1,358 peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus (2015–2025), filtered to the Engineering subject area. VOSviewer was employed to construct a keyword co-occurrence network from 201 qualified author keywords. Results reveal that time history analysis, seismic performance, and soil–structure interaction constitute the three most prominent research nodes. Five thematic clusters were identified, spanning nonlinear dynamic simulation, performance-based seismic design, structural vulnerability assessment, and emerging data-driven approaches. Overlay visualization indicates that deep learning and seismic resilience represent the most recent research frontiers. China (295 articles), Iran (183), and India (163) dominate scholarly output, with Engineering Structures (144 articles) as the leading publication source. These findings provide a structured evidence base for identifying critical knowledge gaps in seismic structural engineering research.

References

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2022). Indeks risiko bencana Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: BNPB.
Chopra, A. K. (2020). Dynamics of structures: Theory and applications to earthquake engineering (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.
De Domenico, D., & Ricciardi, G. (2019). An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 47(5), 1169–1192. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3011
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Federal Emergency Management Agency. (2020). FEMA P-2090: Recommended options for improving the built environment for post-earthquake reoccupancy. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Filiatrault, A., & Sullivan, T. (2014). Performance-based seismic design of nonstructural building components. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 13(1), 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0238-9
Hosseini, M., & Farsangi, E. N. (2021). Seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frames under near-fault ground motions. Engineering Structures, 247, 113081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113081
Hutchings, S. J., & Mooney, W. D. (2021). The seismicity of Indonesia and tectonic implications. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 22(9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GC009812
Kim, J., & Lee, T. H. (2022). Machine learning-based prediction of seismic response of building structures. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 83(4), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2022.83.4.543
Lourenço, P. B., & Pinto Cruz, J. M. (2020). Seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings. Engineering Structures, 214, 110621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110621
Nascimbene, R., & Pavese, A. (2021). Seismic fragility of existing reinforced concrete frames. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19(3), 1397–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01021-x
Noureldin, M., & Kim, J. (2021). Seismic performance-based design optimization using deep reinforcement learning. Engineering Structures, 246, 112943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112943
Putra, F. S., & Saputra, E. (2026). Perbandingan respons struktur gedung dengan variasi bentuk denah menggunakan metode respons spektrum dan time history. Proceeding Civil Engineering Research Forum, 5(2), 14–22.
Silvestri, S., Trombetti, T., Gasparini, G., & Ricci, I. (2020). Direct five-step procedure for the preliminary seismic design of buildings with added viscous dampers. Engineering Structures, 173, 933–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.050
SNI 1726:2019. (2019). Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk struktur bangunan gedung dan nongedung. Jakarta: Badan Standardisasi Nasional.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Downloads

How to Cite

Hardawati, A. (2026). Analisis bibliometrik perkembangan dan pemetaan lanskap tematik penelitian respons seismik struktur bangunan. CE ReForm, 6(1), 104-115. https://doi.org//03jmn125