Infrastruktur ramah pesepeda di berbagai belahan dunia: tinjauan literatur terhadap fasilitas, regulasi, dan penegakan hukum di enam negara


Date Published : 30 July 2026
paper-cover

Contributors

Laziqoh Zahatul Tolab

Universitas Islam Indonesia
Correspondence Author

Faizul Chasanah

Author

Ricky Aulia Nugraha

Universitas Islam Indonesia
Author

DOI

ISBN

2962-2697

Keywords

Cycling facilities Cycling infrastructure Punishment Regulations Narrative literatur review

Proceeding

Track

General Track

License

Copyright (c) 2026 CE ReForm

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The use of bicycles as sustainable transportation is increasing globally, but its effectiveness depends on adequate infrastructure and supportive policies. This study evaluates the effectiveness of cycling infrastructure, supporting facilities, regulations, and law enforcement in ensuring cyclist safety and comfort across different geographic and administrative contexts. The research method employed is a literature review with a comparative analysis of six regions: Indonesia, Malaysia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Canada, and Tshwane. The results indicate significant disparities in the implementation of facilities; the Netherlands leads as a global standard through the “bicycle street” concept and intelligent traffic management systems, while developing countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, and Tshwane still face challenges in the form of fragmented lanes, technical design inconsistencies, and low compliance with road geometric standards. Regulatory differences are also evident in the varying helmet requirements and the more mature efforts to integrate active transportation in developed countries. Additionally, law enforcement is a key factor, low financial fines in Indonesia are considered insufficient to provide an optimal deterrent effect compared to the demerit point systems and consistent penalties implemented in Canada, New Zealand, and the Netherlands. Thus, the success of a bicycle-based transportation system is not solely determined by the provision of physical lanes, but must be supported by adequate signage, clear regulations, and a “share the road” culture that is consistently enforced to create a safe, comfortable, and sustainable mobility ecosystem.

References

Adam, L., Jones, T., & te Brömmelstroet, M. (2020). Planning for cycling in the dispersed city: establishing a hierarchy of effectiveness of municipal cycling policies. Transportation, 47(2), 503–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9878-3
Aryanta, I. W. R., & Maharani, S. E. (2023). Dampak Buruk Polusi Udara Bagi Kesehatan Dan Cara Meminimalkan Risikonya. JURNAL ECOCENTRISM, (2), 47–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36733/jeco.v3i2.7035
Bertaud, A. (2014). Markets, design through regulations, and housing affordability. In New York University, Stern School of Business.
Bruno, M. (2020). The challenge of the bicycle street: Applying collaborative governance processes while protecting user centered innovations. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100209
Dooper, S. (2016). Cycling around the car : an analysis of America’s car culture, cycling for transportation in the Netherlands, and an exploration of policy solutions. [University of Louisville]. https://doi.org/10.18297/honors/110
Duri, B. (2024). The Perceived Effectiveness of Planned Measures of Modal Shift in Tshwane, South Africa. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 15(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.5507/tots.2023.022
Gumelar, A., Dewanti, D., & Priyanto, S. (2023). Performace and recommendations for The Development of Bicycle Facilities in The Special Region of Yogyakarta. Journal of Civil Engineering and Planning, 4(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.37253/jcep.v4i1.7292
Haratama, K. R., Susanti, A., Widayanti, A., Wibisono, R. E., Supriyatno, D., Mahardi, P., & Pattisinai, A. R. (2024). Improvement on Street Safety using In-Street Pedestrian Crossing Sign: A Literature Review. Advances in Engineering Research/Advances in Engineering Research, 322–330. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-626-0_33
Harms, L., Bertolini, L., & Brömmelstroet, T. M. (2016). Performance of Municipal Cycling Policies in Medium-Sized Cities in the Netherlands since 2000. . Transport Reviews, 36, 134–162.
Housing, I. and C. C. (2026). Canada and Hamilton invest in active transportation infrastructure. Https://Www.Canada.ca/En/Housing-Infrastructure-Communities/News/2026/03/Canada-and-Hamilton-Invest-in-Active-Transportation-Infrastructure.Html.
Hubbig, A., Hasan, A., Anif, B., Carlo, N., & Fuadi, A.-B. (2024). Strategi Mewujudkan Kampus Hijau Melalui Transportasi Berkelanjutan Menurut UI GreenMetric Di Kampus Politeknik Negeri Medan. STRUCTURE (JURNAL SIPIL), 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31000/civil.v6i1.11127
Institute for Transportation and Development Policy Indonesia. (2024). Meningkatkan keselamatan jalan melalui adopsi dan regulasi kendaraan listrik roda dua.
Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP). (2021). Annual report 2020.
Iswantono, T., Angelia, E., & Kadembo, M. (2021). Analisa Perilaku Happy Gowes Terhadap Marka Utuh Di Jalan Darmo Surabaya. Court Review: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 1(3), 35–46.
Khair, S. K. M., Dahlan, N. H. M., & Wahab, H. (2019). Konsep Liabiliti Dan Pemberian Pampasan Ganti Rugi Dalam Kemalangan Jalan Raya Menurut Perundangan Islam. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, (10), 45–77.
Khoirunnisa’, R. (2026). Navigating User Needs: Priority Improvements of Bicycle Lanes in Suroto Street, Yogyakarta City. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1595(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1595/1/012002
Khoirunnisa’, R., Agustin, I. W., & Sutikno, F. R. (2025). Prioritas Utama Pelayanan Jalur Sepeda Berdasarkan Persepsi Pengguna di Jalan Suroto, Kota Yogyakarta. In JURPAS Journal of Urban and Regional Planning Society (Vol. 01).
Kudu, F. R., & Soeskandi, H. (2023). Penerapan Sanksi Yang Tepat Terhadap Pengguna Sepeda Yang Melanggar Aturan Lalu Lintas. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.190
Kurniawan, S. (2025). KAJIAN EFEKTIFITAS JALUR SEPEDA DENGAN METODE BICYCLE LEVEL OF SERVICE (BLOS) TAMAN MERDEKA KOTA METRO. TAPAK (Teknologi Aplikasi Konstruksi) Jurnal Program Studi Teknik Sipil, 14(2).
Lekgothoane, D. (2015). The feasibility of bicycling in moving away from the automobile-centric city: The case of Johannesburg.
Lukita, C., Pebiyanti, M. M., Henry, H., Tan, H. M., Adriana, D., & Jaya, A. (2025). Peningkatan Kesadaran Masyarakat Urban terhadap Transportasi Berbasis Sepeda. ADI Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 180–189. https://doi.org/10.34306/adimas.v5i2.1212
Macbeth, A., Lieswyn, J., & Foxon, R. (2011, April). Separated Bicycle Facilities in Christchurch. IPENZ Transportation Group Conference.
Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDot). (2015). Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide. .
Mohd Noor, H., Azlima, M., & M.Z., R. (2018). Aktiviti berbasikal: Pemangkin kelestarian kampus. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 14(3), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2018-1403-07
NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi. (n.d.). Cycling network guidance. Https://Www.Nzta.Govt.Nz/Walking-Cycling-and-Public-Transport/Cycling/Cycling-Standards-and-Guidance/Cycling-Network-Guidance.
Patrick, N. L. (2024). Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna Sepeda yang Menggunakan Jalur Sepeda Permanen di Sudirman-Thamrin. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 3, 439–453.
Pojani, D., Bakija, D., Shkreli, E., Corcoran, J., & Mateo-Babiano, I. (2017). Do Northwestern and Southeastern Europe Share a Common “Cycling Mindset”? Comparative Analysis of Beliefs toward Cycling in the Netherlands and the Balkans. EJTIR Issue, 17(1), 25–45.
Prahara, E., Setiadie, H., & Arofah, M. (2025). Two Wheels, a Million Benefits: The Evaluation of Jakarta’s Bicycle Lane Infrastructure. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1488(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1488/1/012042
Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2007). At the Frontiers of Cycling: Policy Innovations in the Netherlands, Denmark, and Germany. http://www.policy.rutgers.edu/faculty/pucher.html
Ramli, M. Z., Aziz, N. A. A., Hamid, N. B., Azman, N. S., Razman, R., Zawawi, M. H., & Ismail, I. N. (2018). Assessment of Existing Bicycle Facilities in Private and Public Universities in Klang Valley. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2030, No. 1, p. 020243). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5066884
Reggiani, G., Dabiri, A., Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2019). Clustering-based methodology for estimating bicycle accumulation levels on signalized links: a case study from the Netherland. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), 1788–1793.
Romadhona, P. J. (2019). Safety Level Of Pedestrian In Urban Area. Warta Penelitian Perhubungan, 24(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25104/warlit.v24i4.1016
Salim, P. I. S., Rusli, R., Rahim, S. A. S. M., & Diah, J. Md. (2025). Assessing the impact of demographic and contextual factors on cyclist safety at midblock locations and intersections. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 32(2).
Samsudin, I. (2020). Analisa Faktor Penyebab Kecelakaan Pada Ruas Jalan Ir. H. Alala Kota Kendari Ditinjau dari Prasarana dan Geometrik Jalan. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat, 21(1), 59–66.
Setiabudi, A., Nuriman, E. J., Hidayat, R., Dewi, M. P., & Muksin, N. N. (2025). Strategi Implementasi Kebijakan Pengurangan Emisi melalui Infrastruktur Sepeda di Perkotaan Indonesia di Kota Bekasi. PANDITA: Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Affairs, 8(1), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.61332/ijpa.v8i1.267
Shekari, Z. A., Moeinaddini, M., & Shah, M. Z. (2015). A bicycle safety index for evaluating urban street facilities. . Traffic Injury Prevention, 16(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2014.936010
Si, H., Liang, J., Ke, J., Cheng, L., & De Vos, J. (2024). What limits improper bike-sharing parking most: Penalties or incentives? Findings from an online behavioral experiment. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 107, 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2024.09.001
Thorne, R., Fanueli, E., Wild, K., Hirsch, L., Raja, A., Witten, K., Mackie, H., & Woodward, A. (2022). WALKING AND CYCLING CULTURES IN SOUTH AUCKLAND. www.mackieresearch.co.nz
Warner, J., Hurwitz, D. S., Monsere, C. M., & Fleskes, K. (2017). A simulator-based analysis of engineering treatments for right-hook bicycle crashes at signalized intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 104, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.021
Wijaya, N. D. P., Zubizaretta, Z. D., Kurniasari, M. W., & Pangamiani, K. (2023). Evaluation of the Provision Of Specific Bicycle Lanes in the Malang City. Journal Innovation of Civil Engineering (JICE), 4(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33474/jice.v4i1.19615
Yuniar, P. H., Pujiastuti, E., Arifin, Z., & Hendraprasanto, S. (2026). Perlindungan Hukum Pengguna Sepeda Listrik Di Kota Semarang. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 9(1), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i1.13832

Downloads

How to Cite

Chasanah, F., & Nugraha, R. (2026). Infrastruktur ramah pesepeda di berbagai belahan dunia: tinjauan literatur terhadap fasilitas, regulasi, dan penegakan hukum di enam negara . CE ReForm, 6(1), 329-340. https://doi.org//yr0a9563